Tags

09 2011 2012 access Accountability activism ad free adequacy target advertisements AEJ Alliance for Educational Justice Analysis Assault Award Behavior Behind Closed Doors below poverty leavel Best Performing Schools bill & melinda gates foundation Bill Gates Vision bombardment brand name bucks county budget budget crunch Budget cuts Budget Deficit buliding a youth movement business Campaign Capacity Caucus champions Change Charter Charter School Community chester Chester Uppland Chicago CIW Classroom Support Climate closure Coalition of Immokalee workers college College Access Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Communities community Community Input Community Voice Companies congress Congressional contract corbett Corporate philanthropy costing out study crisis customers Dangerous debt decisions desperate Discipline Disparity district DISTRICT BUDGET CUTS districts Drained resources drugs schools Education Education for Liberation Education Reform education spending Education Stakeholders Educational choice empowerement Empty promises Engagement environment equal funding Equality ethically wrong exchange excluded exploits fair fair food agreement Federal Department of Education Financial aid forced choice Funding furness high school future government governor corbett Governor Tom Corbett Great Schools guidelines Hardship harm health help support the ciw Historic Image Imagine 2014 Immigrant Farmworkers inappropriate income Injustice innocent Interpersonal Investing Irresponsible issues k-12 school closing duncan usa cities damaging edu kipp Lamberton law Leaders Leadership leaf learning legislation Legislators library LIFE LIFE Campaign Listening Tour lives local low wages Lowest Performing Schools major cuts marketers Martin Luther King Mastery misleading money national national attention National Campaign for Quality Education national organizing NCLB NCQE Neighborhood safety Neighborhood schools New Schools Venture Fund No Child Left Behind Nonviolent Platform nutrition obama obama administration on blast open mic opposition organization organizing overbrook high school overcrowding PA Painful parents Parochial schools pennsbury pennsylvania Pennsylvania Coalition of Public Charter Schools penny philadelphia Philadelphia Charters for Excellence Philadelphia Education Philadelphia Great Schools Compact Philadelphia Student Union philly Philly student union poor Poor Peoples Movement poverty power President Obama private Private schools Privatization problem product advertising profit programs progress project peace proposals protest Provocative PSU PSU meetingsevents public education public education reform public hearing public schools Pulitzer quality education radio Rally Reactionary Reading reality rejected relief Resources Restorative rev. dr. martin luther king jr. Root Causes Saturday Meetings Sayre high school SB1 scholarships school School choice School Closings school district School District of Philadelphia School Funding school reform School Reform Commission school safety School Violence schools Secretary Arne Duncan sepa slaves Society southeast pa Special Events state statewide Structural Struggling districts Struggling schools student student loan student union Students Students left behind success suffering supplies Symptom system Tax dollars Taxpayers teachers Temple The Philadelphia Student Union tim time tomato toys trade-off Trader Joes transformation turnaround Under-performing schools underfunded unequal unfairly union Victims Victory Violence voice voices voucher campaign Vouchers Waiver Walmart Washington DC wealthy Weighted Student Funding Weiss West Philadelphia Wild won workshop youth youth jobs Youth Leadership Youth Leadership Team Youth Organizing Youth United for Change Zero Tolerance

PSU Blog

Tags >> environment
kobymurp

As a former Philadelphia public school student, I can only imagine where education is heading when the only stories regarding students are told from the outside looking in. With adequate funding of our schools and a serious analysis of not only what students need in the classroom, but also what they’re dealing with outside their school doors, peer-to-peer violence would decline.

I can’t stress it enough that if there were more supports inside of schools that catered to the stark and frightening issues our young people face at home and in their communities the school environment would improve. Students are coming to school from broken homes, raising siblings, abuse, and a host of other constraints that often aren’t addressed inside of school. It’s very easy for publications and adults alike to just demonize students and sensationalize the violence in schools without ever talking about the root causes of that violence and the steps that could be taken to resolve them.

Young people didn’t create the larger societal issues, like poverty, that lead to violence inside schools. The reality is, that despite their hardships, students endure inside and outside of school, many manage to make the most out of the education they receive. Which is why I find it extremely disheartening that a news publication can win an award at the expense of students.

The Philadelphia Inquirer was recently honored in March with the Larry Weiss Award for Investigative Journalism which is open to journalism of any medium (print, broadcast or online) produced in the Philadelphia metropolitan area, South Jersey or Delaware. It includes one top prize of $10,000 and two special recognition prizes of $2,500. In addition to the Weiss Award on Monday April 16th The Philadelphia Inquirer also won the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service. The Philadelphia Inquirer received these awards for their Assault On Learning series that looked at the issues of school violence in Philadelphia.

The Inquirer’s series, however, only reflected student participation as victims or aggressors of school violence. There was no investigation into what students think could change the violence they see inside their schools.

The violence captured in the Inquirer’s Assault On Learning series seemed like an insurmountable task for  anyone to try and change. In fact the series left me, a graduate of the Philadelphia School District, frightened by the accounts of youth violence. 5 of the 7 pieces of the 7 part series presented such an overwhelming sense of despair that I found myself believing our students and our schools were hopeless.

Provocative portraits like the Assault On Learning series don’t help students, it only condemns them. Sensationalizing the interpersonal violence in schools is like waving the green flag to usher in more zero tolerance inside of schools and shaping the image of young people as dangerous.

Yes violence occurs in Philadelphia schools, I know this first hand, but it’s ludicrous to only cast the spotlight upon the acts of violence committed by students and not the underlying issues that lead to that behavior. Violence is a symptom of the greater injustices that our schools, communities, and students are suffering. Our schools don’t have money, our communities don’t have money, and our students don’t have money. This lack of money which provides the access to much needed resources is downright painful. It’s irresponsible to only look at school violence as students running wild and not as a reactionary response to the structural violence they face in under-resourced schools and communities.  

Philadelphia schools have the capacity to serve students better and The Campaign For Nonviolent Schools outlines how. According to its platform school violence will decrease if the discipline, student supports, student voice and classroom engagement are the main focus. “Climate improves when young people receive individualized attention and when they don’t fall through the cracks.” The CNS platform of restorative practices that include individualized attention for students is the solution to violence found in Philadelphia schools. Just this past Tuesday, young people from CNS groups attended a meeting of the School District’s School Safety Committee,to share their best practices for supportive school discipline. The members of the committee include school principals, district officials and representatives of the Mayor’s office and is chaired by School Reform Commissioner, Lorene Cary.


kobymurp

Since 2009 the Campaign for Nonviolent Schools (CNS) has been working to engage leaders of the School District and the community in  addressing school climate issues that don’t push students into the criminal justice system .

The Campaign for Nonviolent Schools believes that by ending bias violence, the school to prison pipeline, and using restorative justice practices we can heal our schools and communities.

The work CNS does is important because nonviolent schools and communities can lead students to successful lives and as a result successful communities. The Campaign for Nonviolent Schools also brings together 11 diverse organizations from around the city all the while keeping youth voice and youth-created solutions at the forefront.

In honor of Dr. King’s legacy of nonviolence, youth and adults from around Philadelphia are coming together to take action to create nonviolent schools and communities.  

On MLK Day, Monday, January 16th, from 1pm-4pm at  Arch Street Methodist Church (55 N Broad St), join the Campaign for Nonviolent Schools for an expert panel of youth and adults, and workshops that will give you concrete skills and steps you can take to reduce violence.  

Some of the panel speakers will be Steve Korr from the International Institute for Restorative Practices, Ayesha Imani of Freedom Schools, Helen Gym of Asian Americans United and youth leader Joshua Glenn of CNS and the Youth Art & Self-Empowerment Project (YASP).

Workshops will include: Implementing Restorative Practices, Ending Bias Violence, Creating Nonviolent Schools, and Ending the School to Prison Pipeline.  This event is free and open to the public.  

Pre-register for the event at: www.endingviolence.eventbrite.com

King quote regarding the urgency of helping others


kobymurp

Bucks County’s Pennsbury School District is allowing marketers to place advertisements inside their schools for profit. Subjecting students to advertising inside of schools in order to make money is ethically wrong.

Schools are supposed to act as the conduit between students and their success. However, in hopes to alleviate their budget crunch, the Pennsbury School District is allowing itself to act as the conduit between companies and students who could become customers of the companies behind the advertising.

Once again, major cuts to public education leave districts to fend for themselves and districts are now wading into the waters of business to stay afloat.

“It’s imperative we find alternate means to preserve our programs,” Assistant Superintendent W. David Bowman told the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Why is it that school districts are forced to make up for such deep budget cuts?  
On the surface it seems like an innocent trade-off. Schools give companies access to their students in exchange for much needed funding (a possible annual income of $425,000 according to a recent article from AllGov.com).  There are clearly outlined advertising guidelines: the advertisements must relate to health, education, nutrition, or school safety. Some would ask, where’s the harm?

But regardless of Pennsbury’s guidelines that prohibit direct product advertising, the presence of a brand name or it’s image is inappropriate inside of schools. Once you become associated to a brand or its name you are more likely to purchase their products. It’s bad enough students are subject to enough product bombardment in most facets of life, could we at least keep schools an ad free environment?

Another striking question is how far is $425,000 going to stretch when the budget keeps getting cut? If budget cuts become worse, districts will once again have to dig themselves out of the hole.

As districts get more desperate, will schools lift the advertisement firewall that mandates the ads must be related to health, education, nutrition, or school safety? That’s the million dollar question; would districts allow more direct product advertising in the event they needed more funding and could get it from marketers? Is this the beginning of a slippery slope towards treating students as consumers?

While I firmly don’t agree with allowing advertisers into schools, I can certainly understand why districts are making this choice. Districts like Bucks County’s Pennsbury School District are just trying to get what they need for students to achieve.